Nazem Kadri’s Game 4 overtime goal should’ve been one of those storybook, “Hollywood” moments. Instead, for many, the “too many men on the ice” debate hangs over that Kadri overtime-winner.
Cooper hints at ‘too many men on ice’ during Kadri Game 4 OT goal
Chances are, the debates were already happening. Still, Lightning coach Jon Cooper added fuel to the “too many men on the ice” fire when he wondered if Sport 4 of the 2022 Stanley Cup Final would “still be happening” during his press conference.
“This one is going to sting much more than others, just because it was taking on … it was potentially … I don’t know … it’s hard for me. It’s going to be hard for me to speak. I’m going to have to speak. I’ll speak with you tomorrow, ” Cooper said after Game four, via ESPN . “You’re going to see what I mean when you see the winning goal. And my heart breaks for the players. Because we probably still should be playing. ”
As Cooper mentioned, he may expand on those comments sometime on Thursday. For what it’s worth, Avs coach Jared Bednar didn’t think much of it.
Jared Bednar on 2-many men: pic. twitter. com/fARDeHmunO
— Michael Traikos (@Michael_Traikos) June 23, 2022
Initially, the focus was on how hard it was to detect that the puck was in the net. Clearly, the conversation eventually morphed into something else.
For what it’s worth, the NHL released the following statement on the matter:
Statement from NHL Hockey Operations on OT Game 4-winning goal: pic. twitter. com/U4dXa2GDTe
— Stephen Whyno (@SWhyno) June 23, 2022
This statement arose as people were really getting in the weeds. People noted that Erik Johnson was listed on the ice on a game sheet, which was then edited?
🎶One of these things is not like the other …🎶
On left, the score sheet handed to media at Game 4. On the right, what’s on NHL dot com. pic. twitter. com/MrtClTLtIi
— Greg Wyshynski (@wyshynski) June 23, 2022
Did that issue ? It only becomes more of a head-scratching situation as you dive deeper into the rabbit hole.
Fans break down debate from every angle
Every now and then, hockey fans justify comparisons to how people break down “The Zapruder Film. ” The “too lots of men on the ice” controversy surrounding the Nazem Kadri OT goal justifies such comparisons.
Plenty of breakdowns cropped up along these lines, with people noting Kadri as Nathan MacKinnon ‘s replacement:
Here’s a much better view. There can be zero question of how bad of a non call this was. pic. twitter. com/ZhKTgJ9C68
— Bolts Jolts (@BoltsJolts) June 23, 2022
Naturally, there was backlash to the backlash.
Some countered about how many Lightning players were on the ice when the Avalanche may have been guilty of having too many men:
— Roberto Norori (@RobertoNorori) 06 23, 2022
Beyond that, some fans cashed in receipts for when they believed the particular Lightning should’ve received a “too many men on the ice” penalty. Take, for instance, a moment that apparently prompted then-Islanders coach Barry Trotz to drop a stream of profanities:
Super had too many men upon go-ahead goal. Barry Trotz after seeing replay: “Seven f**king guys. There’s seven guys on the ice. On the f**king goal. It’s right there. ” photo. twitter. com/CsLyoNq9c6
— Brady Trettenero (@BradyTrett) Summer 16, 2021
Indeed, there were a lot of snipes and barbs. Luckily, there have been also some good jokes .
Reviewing ‘too many men on the ice’ calls probably wouldn’t be worth it
So , did the Avalanche have too many men on the ice during the process of Nazem Kadri scoring that OT goal in order to win Game 4? Probably.
Things get fuzzier if you ask if that really made a material impact on the play.
An NHL assistant coach to me just now on Jon Cooper’s postgame presser and the too many males on the ice drama:
— MurphysLaw74 (@MurphysLaw74) June 23, 2022
The Athletic’s Michael Russo contacted two former NHL officials who both stated that it wasn’t worthy of a “too many men on the ice” call. More than a few observers believe it’s the type of exchange that happens often , and the NHL could open the can of worms if it overreacts to this controversy.
I went to bed immediately after the game ended last night, so I’m just seeing the too-many-men controversy. My initial thought: Did Kadri leave the bench too early? Sure did. Does that go uncalled a dozen times every game? Sure does.
— Mark Lazerus (@MarkLazerus) June 23, 2022
Sometimes, a sloppy line change is just a sloppy collection change.
Sloppy Line Change vs Too Many Men is going to divide the nation.
— Laura (@theactivestick) June 23, 2022
Personally, I’m amused that this specific call/non-call overshadowed a Game four that devolved into a wince-inducing example of “letting them play the game. ”
There were some especially egregious non-calls, including a trip on Victor Hedman that had the veteran debating with officials . It’s unfortunate that consistent officiating wasn’t the bigger takeaway than a granular “too lots of men on the ice” debate.
— Scouting The Refs (@ScoutingTheRefs) May 25, 2021
NHL playoff history is dotted with officiating controversies. Some, such as Wayne Gretzky’s missed high-stick on Doug Gilmour , will reverberate through hockey history. Just about all NHL fans have some jarring memories, many with both calls that will went for and against their teams.
It’s totally fine with regard to Lightning fans to carry this one, especially if their team cannot rally from a 3-1 series deficit against the Avalanche. Here’s hoping this situation isn’t the sort of thing that inspires a hasty, sloppy overcorrection from the league, though.